PDA

View Full Version : Linux and Open Source: The 2005 Generation


jayanth
01-04-2005, 04:17 AM
Linux and open source are at the heart of today's computing technology. Deal with it.

Sometimes people don't know when a revolution has happened until afterwards. Then, the historians tell us that 2004 was the year that open source started to become computing's mainstream.

Sounds hard to believe? Well, IDC analyst Al Gillen recently said that "Linux is no longer a fringe player. Linux is now mainstream." He made that observation because IDC's research predicts that Linux's overall revenue for desktops, servers and packaged software running on Linux will exceed $35 billion by 2008.

That's a lot of money, even by Bill Gates' piggybank standards.

Most of that growth, today, is on servers. As Efrain Rovira, Hewlett-Packard Co.'s worldwide director of Linux marketing, told me a few days back, customers are turning to blades for their server needs and "more than 50 percent are running Linux."

It's not just HP and Linux companies like Red Hat and Novell that are greeting Linux with open arms. IBM, Intel and Oracle have embraced Linux.

None of these companies are doing it because they get warm fuzzies from neo-hippie, socialist dreams of open software and free love, as some hyperventilating critics have claimed. They're doing it because Linux makes good, hard business sense.

There's more happening here than Linux, though.

Take software development, for example. Open source produces better code. Period. End of statement.

Coverity, maker of software auditing tools, recently found that the Linux kernel has far fewer security vulnerabilities than a typical commercial software package. I'm not surprised.

I'm also not surprised that when developers have a choice of tools, they go for the open-source ones. Most Java developers now use open-source platforms and development tools. And most of the C and C++ programmers I know turn to the GNU tools when it comes time to really produce their programs.

These trends will just keep getting hotter and hotter in 2005.

I also think that the Linux desktop is going to continue to move into offices. I foresee that Linux thin-clients, powered by Novell Linux and Wyse, are going to do especially well in that niche.

You know, though, I don't see Linux becoming the dominant desktop anytime soon, despite the best efforts of companies like Novell, Red Hat and Xandros.

What I do see happening is that open-source desktop applications are going to be appearing on practically every Windows desktop in the next three years.

We're already seeing this trend start with Firefox's success. I think Thunderbird, the Mozilla e-mail client, is going to start making similar, albeit not as dramatic, in-roads on the Outlook Express market.

Thunderbird, however, since it's a pure e-mail client, isn't going to knock Outlook off of corporate desktops anytime soon. But once Mozilla Sunbird, the open-source stand-alone calendaring and task management application, gets up to speed, I can see companies turning from Outlook to Thunderbird and Sunbird.

I even see Microsoft Office, perhaps the most bloated software suite ever, finally losing ground. That's because Sun's open-source OpenOffice.org 2.0 is looking very, very good.

Not only does it have excellent Office file format compatibility, it's finally become a fast application. I've used OpenOffice for ages, but I've never warmed up to it. It's always been too darn slow. With this last pre-beta, though… woo! Look out Microsoft Office, OpenOffice means business.

And so does open source in 2005. No, you may not be running a Linux desktop at year's end. But I'm willing to bet that most of you will be running at least one open-source program on your desktop and that in the back-office you're going to be running open-source applications on Linux servers.

The revolution has arrived.

1. Use Firefox For A Safer System (http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1745091,00.asp)
2. A Pair Of Linux Stocking Stuffers (http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1736953,00.asp)
3. A Year Of Victory For Linux (http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1731490,00.asp)
4. It's About Time The GPL Was Revised (http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1730592,00.asp)
5. Is Microsoft Taking A Legal Ain At Linux? (http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1725712,00.asp)

jayanth
01-04-2005, 04:26 AM
I posted this for you guys to know what went one.. Also read the last link and why Microsoft sucks..

sage
01-04-2005, 02:59 PM
Linux should work on the compatibility issues so many things still dont work on linux :(

jayanth
01-04-2005, 03:55 PM
There no such thing as not working on Linux.. Everything is available for linux except probably games..

mani_rawalpindi
01-04-2005, 04:07 PM
but thats main point i think the moment Linux fix the games compatibility issue it will become a fierce competitor probably better then windows but till then Linux is no match for windows

jayanth
01-04-2005, 04:20 PM
Linux is not for Games.. there is much more of it that gaming.. the only fact is that it can handle gmaes really well.. So the one thing that remains to be done is make games for it.. Which is already happenning..

mani_rawalpindi
01-04-2005, 05:32 PM
Yeah games for Linux will be great

jayanth
01-04-2005, 05:41 PM
Counter Strike will probably be the first.. YAY!!

mani_rawalpindi
01-05-2005, 12:52 PM
is it announced sorry i really didnt know

rizaaj
01-05-2005, 07:35 PM
well i totally agree that linux is much better than windows.. specially with the viruses thingy... im not sure but i heard that there was some virus attack on linux and it was solved jus in 6-7 hours and till then there not been any threat on it.. and in windows every day hundreds are developed and not even half of them destroyed

jayanth
01-07-2005, 05:42 AM
A virus that attacts any system, will generally look for data like email ids etc, to send itself to others.. But getting data in Linux is Highly impossible.. Thats the kind of security it gives you..